Complications and Failures of Subclavian-Vein Catheterization

To the Editor: Mansfield et al. (Dec. 29 issue) 1 found that ultrasound-guided location of the subclavian vein was not beneficial, as compared with standard insertion procedures for subclavian-vein catheterization. The authors used ultrasound only to mark the site of insertion and did not study real...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1995-06, Vol.332 (23), p.1579-1581
Hauptverfasser: Jobes, David R, Ellison, Norig, Troianos, Christopher A, Weber, Martin, Huber, Christoph, Oates, A, Hajela, V, Channer, K.S, Kaufman, Jeffrey L, Eynon, C.A, Johnson, James R, Mansfield, Paul F, Gregurich, Mary Ann, Haire, William D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Mansfield et al. (Dec. 29 issue) 1 found that ultrasound-guided location of the subclavian vein was not beneficial, as compared with standard insertion procedures for subclavian-vein catheterization. The authors used ultrasound only to mark the site of insertion and did not study real-time ultrasound guidance of catheter placement. We believe that real-time ultrasound guidance might have been beneficial because of the favorable findings of another study 2 and the reported success with ultrasound guidance of internal jugular-vein catheterization. 3 – 5 A simple mark on the skin does not indicate the axis that will engage the vessel. The deeper the structure, . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM199506083322313