Sampling Errors in pH and Blood Gas Analysis—An Evaluation of Three New Arterial Blood Samplers
We have tested the accuracy, acceptability and general performance of three recently-marketed samplers for arterial blood gas measurement (the Corning Arterial Blood Sampler, the Concord ‘Pulsator’ and the Sarstedt ‘Monovette’™). All three greatly reduce or eliminate the error of venous sampling, an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of clinical biochemistry 1986-05, Vol.23 (3), p.329-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We have tested the accuracy, acceptability and general performance of three recently-marketed samplers for arterial blood gas measurement (the Corning Arterial Blood Sampler, the Concord ‘Pulsator’ and the Sarstedt ‘Monovette’™). All three greatly reduce or eliminate the error of venous sampling, and the Corning and Sarstedt samplers eliminate the risk of dilution of the sample by excess heparin solution. A positive bias in pO2 measurement, more marked at higher levels, was demonstrated with the Concord and Sarstedt samplers, and the latter carry a slightly increased risk of cross-infection. None of the samplers completely overcame potential sampling errors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-5632 1758-1001 |
DOI: | 10.1177/000456328602300314 |