Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: Patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters
Background/Aims : Most patients receive conscious sedation for gastroscopy. However, the benefit of the most often used combination of low-dose intravenous midazolam and topical lidocaine on patient tolerance remains poorly defined and has not been shown to outweigh cardiorespiratory risks. To respo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 1995-03, Vol.108 (3), p.697-704 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background/Aims
:
Most patients receive conscious sedation for gastroscopy. However, the benefit of the most often used combination of low-dose intravenous midazolam and topical lidocaine on patient tolerance remains poorly defined and has not been shown to outweigh cardiorespiratory risks. To respond to these issues, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective study was performed.
Methods
:
Two hundred outpatients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy were assigned to receive either (1) midazolam (35 μg/kg) and lidocaine spray (100 mg), (2) midazolam and placebo lidocaine, (3) placebo midazolam and lidocaine, or (4) placebo midazolam and placebo lidocaine.
Results
:
Tolerance (visual analogue scale, 0–100 points; 0, excellent; 100, unbearable) improved as compared with placebo midazolam and placebo lidocaine by 23 points (95% confidence interval, 15–32) in group 1, 15 points (95% confidence interval, 7–24) in group 2, and 10 points (95% confidence interval, 2–18) in group 3. Increasing age (
P < 0.001), low anxiety (
P < 0.001), and male sex (
P < 0.03), but not amnesia, were associated with better patient tolerance. Oxygen desaturation ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5085 1528-0012 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90441-7 |