Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations
In this study, the metabolic performances of a new energy-storing foot (Proteor) and of the solid-ankle cushion heel (SACH) are compared. Twelve patients with traumatic below-knee amputations (mean age: 50.0 ± 19.9 years) and 12 patients with vascular below-knee amputations (mean age: 73 ± 7 years)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1995, Vol.76 (1), p.39-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, the metabolic performances of a new energy-storing foot (Proteor) and of the solid-ankle cushion heel (SACH) are compared. Twelve patients with traumatic below-knee amputations (mean age: 50.0 ± 19.9 years) and 12 patients with vascular below-knee amputations (mean age: 73 ± 7 years) were studied. Oxygen uptake
(
V
˙
O
2
)
was measured in all the subjects on a walkway at a self-selected velocity; only the subjects with traumatic amputation were tested on a level treadmill (progressive speed: 2.4–4 and 6 km/h), and then in two randomized trials: incline (+5%) and decline walking treadmill test at 4 km/h. Vascular explorations were done in the vascular patients: distal pressure measurements, pulse plethysmography, transcutaneous oxygen tension. Free walking was improved in subjects with traumatic amputation using the energy-storing foot (+6%), with a better bioenergetic efficiency (0.24 ± 0.4mL/kg · m vs 0.22 ± 0.04mL/kg · m). However, in subjects with vascular amputation, this foot did not produce an increased free velocity nor an improved energy cost. During the level treadmill test, the traumatic amputee subjects showed a decrease of energy expenditure with the new prosthetic foot, more significant at sufficient speed (4 km/h): 17.00 ± 3.42 vs 14.67 ± 2.05 mL/kg/min (
p < .05). The same effect is shown during the incline (19.31 ± 2.80 vs 16.79 ± 2.32mL/kg/min—
p < .02) and decline walking tests (14.13 ± 3.64 vs 11.81 ± 1.54mL/kg/min—
p < .02). There is no significant difference in cardiocirculatory effects between the two types of prosthetic foot. Despite a lower velocity, the subjects with vascular amputation exceed 70% of the maximal heart rate, with the cardiocirculatory factor being the main cause of walking restriction. The energy-storing foot should be reserved for active and fast walkers, whereas the SACH foot seems more suitable for elderly patients with amputation with a slow walk. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80040-9 |