The preterm cervix and preterm labor: Relative risks, predictive values, and change over time

The accurate prediction and diagnosis of preterm labor continue to frustrate the clinician. This is partly due to a scarcity of cervical data from the early third trimester. A total of 760 prospective, serial, paired, and blinded pelvic examinations were done at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation for 191 p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1986-10, Vol.155 (4), p.829-834
Hauptverfasser: Stubbs, Thomas M., Van Dorsten, J. Peter, Miller, M. Clinton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The accurate prediction and diagnosis of preterm labor continue to frustrate the clinician. This is partly due to a scarcity of cervical data from the early third trimester. A total of 760 prospective, serial, paired, and blinded pelvic examinations were done at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation for 191 patients without a history of preterm labor. If the cervix was dilated ⩾1 cm (internal os) or effaced >30%, the relative risk of preterm labor was increased to 1.8 to 4.2. Negative predictive values for cervical status were >92%, but positive predictive values were ⩽18%. Change over time was unusual (dilatation increase ⩾1 cm or effacement increase ⩾40%), suggesting that a baseline late second-trimester examination could assist in the early but accurate diagnosis of preterm labor should it be suspected later in gestation. These data suggest that even in the low-risk patient, an early cervical examination could be beneficial.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(86)80031-X