Intermediate-term results with 1,019 Carbomedics aortic valves

Background. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the intermediate-term outcome in patients with the Carbomedics aortic valve prosthesis. Methods. The study included 1,019 primary valve replacements between 1989 and 1997. Seventy-two percent of patients were men; mean (standard deviation)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2001-04, Vol.71 (4), p.1181-1187
Hauptverfasser: Li, Hui-Hua, Hahn, Joar, Urbanski, Paul, Torka, Marius, Grunkemeier, Gary L, Hacker, Robert W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the intermediate-term outcome in patients with the Carbomedics aortic valve prosthesis. Methods. The study included 1,019 primary valve replacements between 1989 and 1997. Seventy-two percent of patients were men; mean (standard deviation) age was 61 (10) years. The preoperative New York Heart Association functional class was III or IV in 70% of patients. Follow-up at 9 years was 99.6% complete, comprising 2,730 patient-years (mean, 2.7 years). Results. Patient survival, including operative deaths, was 80% at 7 years. The linearized death rate was 2.9%/year. Statistically significant risk factors for mortality were diabetes, pure valve insufficiency, advanced age at operation, and advanced preoperative functional class. Linearized rates were thrombosis, 0.1%/year; thromboembolism, 1.0%/year; hemorrhage, 1.7%/year; endocarditis, 0.1%/year; paravalvular leak, 0.1%/year; reoperation, 0.1%/year; and all events, 3.0%/year. The 7-year estimates of freedom from complications were thrombosis, 99%; thromboembolism, 93%; hemorrhage, 89%; endocarditis, 99%; paravalvular leak, 99.7%; reoperation, 99%; and all events, 82%. No structural valve failure was observed. Conclusions. The low incidence of valve-related complications favors the continued use of the Carbomedics valve in the aortic position.
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02652-7