A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip

Patients who had anterolateral and posterolateral approaches in total hip replacement surgery were compared clinically for limp, dislocation, hospital stay, and discharge disposition. The only statistical difference was that the posterior approach had a statistically higher dislocation rate. Althoug...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2001-04, Vol.385 (385), p.95-99
Hauptverfasser:	RITTER, Merrill A, HARTY, Leesa D, KEATING, Michael E, FARIS, Philip M, MEDING, John B
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	99
container_issue	385
container_start_page	95
container_title	Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume	385
creator	RITTER, Merrill A HARTY, Leesa D KEATING, Michael E FARIS, Philip M MEDING, John B
description	Patients who had anterolateral and posterolateral approaches in total hip replacement surgery were compared clinically for limp, dislocation, hospital stay, and discharge disposition. The only statistical difference was that the posterior approach had a statistically higher dislocation rate. Although the number of patients with limp was higher in the anterolateral group, the difference was not statistically different.
doi_str_mv	10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77048933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77048933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5c1c41444949805746fd508fd10f98c8b90f61adbbf8fb679818189eb278ae43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1PwyAUhonRuDn9C4bExLvqgUILl8viV2LihZp4RyiFrKYtFboL_71sqzNyAiec8758PAhhAjcEZHkLaeQgiowCEGBpl6VJiiM0J5yKjJCcHqN5qslMUvIxQ2cxfm5NjNNTNEt9oHmez9HrEpu26RujW2x8N-jQRN9j7_C4tlj3ow2-1WlNfd3XePDxX2kYgtdmbSMe_c6yboZzdOJ0G-3FlBfo_f7ubfWYPb88PK2Wz5lhwMes4oYYRhhjkkkBvGSFqzkIVxNwUhhRSXAF0XVVOeGqopSCpJC2oqXQluULdL0_N73ha2PjqLomGtu2urd-E1VZAhMyfXOBxF5ogo8xWKeG0HQ6fCsCagtU_QJVB6BqBzRZL6c7NlVn6z_jRDAJriaBjgmiC7o3TTzoJGe0lPkPJHd9Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77048933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>RITTER, Merrill A ; HARTY, Leesa D ; KEATING, Michael E ; FARIS, Philip M ; MEDING, John B</creator><creatorcontrib>RITTER, Merrill A ; HARTY, Leesa D ; KEATING, Michael E ; FARIS, Philip M ; MEDING, John B</creatorcontrib><description>Patients who had anterolateral and posterolateral approaches in total hip replacement surgery were compared clinically for limp, dislocation, hospital stay, and discharge disposition. The only statistical difference was that the posterior approach had a statistically higher dislocation rate. Although the number of patients with limp was higher in the anterolateral group, the difference was not statistically different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11302333</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2001-04, Vol.385 (385), p.95-99</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5c1c41444949805746fd508fd10f98c8b90f61adbbf8fb679818189eb278ae43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5c1c41444949805746fd508fd10f98c8b90f61adbbf8fb679818189eb278ae43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=954279$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11302333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RITTER, Merrill A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARTY, Leesa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEATING, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FARIS, Philip M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDING, John B</creatorcontrib><title>A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Patients who had anterolateral and posterolateral approaches in total hip replacement surgery were compared clinically for limp, dislocation, hospital stay, and discharge disposition. The only statistical difference was that the posterior approach had a statistically higher dislocation rate. Although the number of patients with limp was higher in the anterolateral group, the difference was not statistically different.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkF1PwyAUhonRuDn9C4bExLvqgUILl8viV2LihZp4RyiFrKYtFboL_71sqzNyAiec8758PAhhAjcEZHkLaeQgiowCEGBpl6VJiiM0J5yKjJCcHqN5qslMUvIxQ2cxfm5NjNNTNEt9oHmez9HrEpu26RujW2x8N-jQRN9j7_C4tlj3ow2-1WlNfd3XePDxX2kYgtdmbSMe_c6yboZzdOJ0G-3FlBfo_f7ubfWYPb88PK2Wz5lhwMes4oYYRhhjkkkBvGSFqzkIVxNwUhhRSXAF0XVVOeGqopSCpJC2oqXQluULdL0_N73ha2PjqLomGtu2urd-E1VZAhMyfXOBxF5ogo8xWKeG0HQ6fCsCagtU_QJVB6BqBzRZL6c7NlVn6z_jRDAJriaBjgmiC7o3TTzoJGe0lPkPJHd9Hw</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>RITTER, Merrill A</creator><creator>HARTY, Leesa D</creator><creator>KEATING, Michael E</creator><creator>FARIS, Philip M</creator><creator>MEDING, John B</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip</title><author>RITTER, Merrill A ; HARTY, Leesa D ; KEATING, Michael E ; FARIS, Philip M ; MEDING, John B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5c1c41444949805746fd508fd10f98c8b90f61adbbf8fb679818189eb278ae43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RITTER, Merrill A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARTY, Leesa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEATING, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FARIS, Philip M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDING, John B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RITTER, Merrill A</au><au>HARTY, Leesa D</au><au>KEATING, Michael E</au><au>FARIS, Philip M</au><au>MEDING, John B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>385</volume><issue>385</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>95-99</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>Patients who had anterolateral and posterolateral approaches in total hip replacement surgery were compared clinically for limp, dislocation, hospital stay, and discharge disposition. The only statistical difference was that the posterior approach had a statistically higher dislocation rate. Although the number of patients with limp was higher in the anterolateral group, the difference was not statistically different.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11302333</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof	Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2001-04, Vol.385 (385), p.95-99
issn	0009-921X 1528-1132
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77048933
source	MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
title	A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A54%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinical%20comparison%20of%20the%20anterolateral%20and%20posterolateral%20approaches%20to%20the%20hip&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=RITTER,%20Merrill%20A&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=385&rft.issue=385&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=95-99&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77048933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77048933&rft_id=info:pmid/11302333&rfr_iscdi=true