Bacteriologic assessment of the lower respiratory tract in intubated patients

Twelve patients with an endotracheal tube and a new infiltrate were assessed for differences in the bacterio-logic information that could be obtained by routine tracheal suctioning (RTS), a double-lumen protected-sheath brush passed through a flexible fiberoptic bron-choscope (B-FFB), and suctioning...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 1986-10, Vol.14 (10), p.864-868
Hauptverfasser: BAIGELMAN, WALTER, BELLIN, STEVEN, CUPPLES, L ADRIENNE, BERENBERG, MARK J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Twelve patients with an endotracheal tube and a new infiltrate were assessed for differences in the bacterio-logic information that could be obtained by routine tracheal suctioning (RTS), a double-lumen protected-sheath brush passed through a flexible fiberoptic bron-choscope (B-FFB), and suctioning through a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (S-FFB). Gram stains and cultures were performed on all specimens. There was 100% agreement for the culture results obtained by RTS and S-FEB. It is concluded that RTS obtains comparable information to that obtained by the more expensive and more personnel-intensive B-FFB.
ISSN:0090-3493
1530-0293
DOI:10.1097/00003246-198610000-00006