A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy : Clinical and economic analyses

Previous randomized studies of laparoscopic appendectomy produced conflicting recommendations, and the adequacy of sample sizes is generally unknown. We compared clinical and economic outcomes after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a sample of predetermined statistical power. A pre-study power...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2001-04, Vol.129 (4), p.390-400
Hauptverfasser: LONG, Kirsten Hall, BANNON, Michael P, ZIETLOW, Scott P, HELGESON, Eva R, HARMSEN, William S, SMITH, C. Daniel, ILSTRUP, Duane M, BAERGA-VARELA, Yvonne, SARR, Michael G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous randomized studies of laparoscopic appendectomy produced conflicting recommendations, and the adequacy of sample sizes is generally unknown. We compared clinical and economic outcomes after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a sample of predetermined statistical power. A pre-study power analysis suggested that 200 randomized patients would yield 80% power to show a mean decrease of 1.3 days' hospitalization. One hundred ninety-eight patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized prospectively to laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Economic analysis included billed charges, total costs, direct costs, and indirect costs associated with treatment. Laparoscopic appendectomy took longer to perform than open appendectomy (median, 107 vs 91 minutes; P
ISSN:0039-6060
1532-7361
DOI:10.1016/S0039-6060(01)15621-7