Percutaneous central venous catheterization in children: First line choice for venous access
Percutaneous central venous (CV) catheters using the jugular and subclavian veins have been widely used for hemodynamic monitoring and for venous access in difficult clinical situations. However, peripheral venous cutdowns (PVC) still remain the primary mode of short-term venous access in children....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric surgery 1986-08, Vol.21 (8), p.685-688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Percutaneous central venous (CV) catheters using the jugular and subclavian veins have been widely used for hemodynamic monitoring and for venous access in difficult clinical situations. However, peripheral venous cutdowns (PVC) still remain the primary mode of short-term venous access in children. To evaluate percutaneous CV line insertion as a routine procedure, a prospective study of 115 patients (75 CV and 40 PVC) was performed. Ages ranged from 1 day to 17 years; age and weight were similar in both groups. Eighty-three CV lines were attempted, with a success rate of 93%, while 82% of 49 PVC insertions were successful. Complications occurred in 11 (14%) patients with CV access and 31 (78%) with PVC lines. In the latter group, poor flow was a problem in 65%, infiltration in 37.5%, and phlebitis in 27.5%. In the CV group, arterial puncture occurred during insertion in 2 (3%) patients with no adverse sequelae, catheter slippage occurred in 4 (5%), and poor flow in 2 (3%). A large majority (79.2%) of CV lines functioned successfully until no longer needed, as compared with 15% of PVC catheters. The latter were removed before completion of treatment because of poor flow (40%), phlebitis (20%), or catheter problems (10%). Catheter sepsis was documented in only one CV line. Two cutdowns had major local infections. The average catheter longevity was 10.2 days for CV lines, 4.1 days for PVC. In view of the proven ease of insertion, the safety and low rate of complications, and the long life of CV lines as compared with PVCs we feel that percutaneous central venous catheterization is the method of choice when venous access other than routine IV access is necesary |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3468 1531-5037 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-3468(86)80387-6 |