Distinct Amplification of the C5a‐Receptor Pathways in Normodense and Hypodense Eosinophils of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

In patients with atopic dermatitis two different types of blood eosinophils with distinct density can be isolated. The normodense cells represent the huge majority in count, whereas the hypodense eosinophils are characterized by higher effector activity. To understand the altered functional responsi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of immunology 2001-03, Vol.53 (3), p.235-239
Hauptverfasser: Czech, W., Dichmann, S., Herouy, Y., Rheinen, H., Elsner, J., Kapp, A., Norgauer, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In patients with atopic dermatitis two different types of blood eosinophils with distinct density can be isolated. The normodense cells represent the huge majority in count, whereas the hypodense eosinophils are characterized by higher effector activity. To understand the altered functional responsiveness of these two cell subtypes, the expression of C5a receptors as well as C5a‐induced signal pathways and the production of reactive oxygen metabolites have been analyzed. Chemiluminescence measurements revealed significant higher production of reactive oxygen metabolites in hypodense eosinophils in comparison to normodense cells. However, no difference in the expression level of C5a receptors as well as in the C5a‐induced Ca2+‐transients between normodense and hypodense eosinophils were found. In contrast, hypodense eosinophils showed a significantly higher actin polymerization response and phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate 3‐kinase activation after stimulation with C5a than normodense eosinophils. Therefore, normodense and hypodense eosinophils from the blood of patients with atopic dermatitis are characterized by differential amplification of C5a‐receptor signal pathways, which might explain the differences in their proinflammatory activity.
ISSN:0300-9475
1365-3083
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.00860.x