An HPLC/UV method for the determination of RGH-1756 in dog and rat plasma
RGH-1756 (1-(2-methoxy-phenyl)-4-{4-[4-(6-imidazo[2,1-b]-thiazolyl)-phenoxy]-butyl}-piperazine dimethansulphonate) is a novel atypical antipsychotic candidate of Gedeon Richter Ltd. A new HPLC method has been developed and validated for the quantitative determination of RGH-1756 in dog and rat plasm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2001-03, Vol.24 (5), p.913-920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | RGH-1756 (1-(2-methoxy-phenyl)-4-{4-[4-(6-imidazo[2,1-b]-thiazolyl)-phenoxy]-butyl}-piperazine dimethansulphonate) is a novel atypical antipsychotic candidate of Gedeon Richter Ltd. A new HPLC method has been developed and validated for the quantitative determination of RGH-1756 in dog and rat plasma. The compound and the internal standard are extracted from the biological samples by a simple and fast liquid–liquid extraction method, using 1-chlorobutane. The recovery for RGH-1756 is about 90%. The extracts are analyzed by reversed phase HPLC (column: Supelcosil-LC-18-DB 250*4.6 mm, 5 μm, eluent:acetonitrile:methanol:0.2 molar ammonium-acetate 40:25:35,
λ=254 nm). The assay is specific for RGH-1756. The standard curves are linear in the range between 10 and 2000 ng ml
−1. The overall precision (expressed as CV%) and accuracy (expressed as bias%) of quality controls and calibration standards are within 15%. The validated lower limit of quantification is 10 ng/ml. No indications have been found for possible instabilities of RGH-1756 in plasma, in the extraction solvent, or after repeated thawing-freezing cycles. The method has been succesfully applied for the bioavailability studies of RGH-1756 in the two animal species. In these studies results of the inprocess method validation have shown the reliability of the method, too. CV% of quality controls in the rat study has been found between 7.4 and 10.0%, in the dog study between 4.1 and 12.5%. The bias has ranged from 0.4 to 3.8% and from −4.5 to 1.2% in the rat and dog study, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0731-7085 1873-264X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00559-8 |