Blocking the buccal nerve using two methods of inferior alveolar block injection

The anatomic relations of the buccal nerve branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve were studied to explain the rationale for the discrepancy in blocking the buccal nerve using two methods of blocking the inferior alveolar nerve, the conventional method and the Gow‐Gates method. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2001-01, Vol.14 (2), p.111-119
1. Verfasser: Aker, F. David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The anatomic relations of the buccal nerve branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve were studied to explain the rationale for the discrepancy in blocking the buccal nerve using two methods of blocking the inferior alveolar nerve, the conventional method and the Gow‐Gates method. The conventional method rarely blocks the buccal nerve, while the Gow‐Gates method is reported to consistently block the buccal nerve. Eight head and mandibular specimens were dissected to observe the path of buccal nerve and its relationship to the path of needles in the conventional and Gow‐Gates techniques. The buccal nerve descends on the medial and then anterior aspect of the deep head of the temporalis muscle (Tdh). At the latter position the buccal nerve enters the retromolar fossa and is encased in a fascial sleeve created by a dense fascial band that spans between the temporalis muscle tendons and the buccinator muscle. At the level of the conventional block injection the buccal nerve was shielded from the path of the needle by the Tdh and the fascial band. In the Gow‐Gates block injection, the buccal nerve was exposed on the medial surface of the Tdh, immediately lateral to the path of the needle and proximal to the fascial sleeve. Consequently, the anatomical relations of the buccal nerve in the conventional block method essentially shield the nerve from being bathed by anesthetic solution while in the Gow‐Gates method the relations are such that the buccal nerve can be exposed to anesthetic solution and thus blocked, explaining the findings in clinical dentistry. Clin. Anat. 14:111–119, 2001. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0897-3806
1098-2353
DOI:10.1002/1098-2353(200103)14:2<111::AID-CA1019>3.0.CO;2-3