Prospective endoscopic study of stress erosions and ulcers in critically ill adult patients treated with either sucralfate or placebo

To compare the frequency of stress erosions and ulcers in critically ill adult patients treated with either sucralfate or placebo. Prospective, randomized study. Intensive care unit in a university hospital. Twenty-six adult patients. All patients were mechanically ventilated and were at risk of dev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 1994-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1949-1954
Hauptverfasser: EDDLESTON, J. M, PEARSON, R. C, HOLLAND, J, TOOTH, J. A, VOHRA, A, DORAN, B. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the frequency of stress erosions and ulcers in critically ill adult patients treated with either sucralfate or placebo. Prospective, randomized study. Intensive care unit in a university hospital. Twenty-six adult patients. All patients were mechanically ventilated and were at risk of developing stress ulceration. Patients were randomized to receive either sucralfate (2 g every 8 hrs) (group 1) via the nasogastric tube (flushed with 10 mL of sterile water) or 20 mL of sterile water every 8 hrs (group 2) via the nasogastric tube. At the time of intensive care unit admission, the frequency of stress (acute) erosions (as assessed with the endoscope) was 21.7%. No ulcers were detected. By day 3, the frequency had increased to 37.5% in group 1 and 88.9% in group 2. Mucosal deterioration was more likely in the patients treated with placebo (water) (p < .05). In total, seven patients developed acute ulceration in group 2 compared with only one patient in group 1 (p < .05). The frequency of gastric colonization with aerobic Gram-negative bacilli was 25.6% in group 1 and 28.6% in group 2. Only one retrograde nosocomial pneumonia developed (group 1). Based on our findings, we strongly recommend the adoption of sucralfate as opposed to no prophylaxis in the prevention of acute upper gastrointestinal ulceration.
ISSN:0090-3493
1530-0293
DOI:10.1097/00003246-199422120-00010