Role of the nitric oxide donor linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1) in the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction

Recently, nitric oxide was shown to be a mediator of penileerection in men and the nitric oxide donor linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1) was introduced as a novel treatment option in patients with erectile dysfunction. We now present our follow-up results with the intracavernous application of SIN-1....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1994-10, Vol.44 (4), p.553-556
Hauptverfasser: Truss, Michael C., Becker, Armin J., Djamilian, Mohamad H., Stiff, Christian G., Jonas, Udo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recently, nitric oxide was shown to be a mediator of penileerection in men and the nitric oxide donor linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1) was introduced as a novel treatment option in patients with erectile dysfunction. We now present our follow-up results with the intracavernous application of SIN-1. One hundred thirteen patients with erectile dysfunction of various etiologies and 10 normal control subjects underwent intracavernous pharmacotesting with 1 mg SIN-1. Of the 113 patients, 71 (62.8%) underwent additional pharmacotesting with a mixture of papaverine (15 mg/mL) and phentolamine (0.5 mg/mL) (P/P). Forty-eight responders to SIN-1 were enrolled in an autoinjection program with this substance. All normal control subjects had full rigid erections lasting 40 to 70 minutes.Of 113 patients, 78 (69%) had responses sufficient for intercourse with SIN-1, and the other 35 patients (31 %) demonstrated inadequate responses. All 44 responders to SIN-1 who also received P/P had erections sufficient for intercourse with P/P in doses of 0.25 to 2 mL (mean, 0.6 ± 0.3 mL). Six patients (13.6%) had prolonged erections with minimal to moderate doses of PIP From the total of 27 patients who had erections insufficient for intercourse with SIN-1, 20 (74.1 %) had good responses with 0.25 to 2.0 mL P/P (mean, 1.5 ± 0.5 mL). One patient (4%) had a prolonged erection with 1.0 mL P/P. After 10 to 150 injections/patient (total of 1160 injections; mean, 24.1 injections), no significant side effects were noted with SIN-1. Our data suggest that intracavernous SIN-1 is safe and efficacious in the majority of patients with erectile dysfunction; however, it has a lower smooth muscle relaxing effect than a combination of P/P. The absence of severe side effects, including priapisms, may be explained by the use of a physiologic pathway for induction of the erectile response and the rapid intracavernous decomposition of SIN-1.
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80058-8