Antiarrhythmic activity of 17β-aminoestratrienes: comparison of 3-ols and 3-acetates with the corresponding 3-(3-amino-2-hydroxypropyl) ethers

The antiarrhythmic efficacy of 17 beta-amino- and 17 beta-amino-16 alpha-hydroxyestratrien-3-ols and 3-acetates (group 1) was compared with the efficacy of corresponding 3-[2-hydroxy-3-(isopropylamino)propyl] and 3-[2-hydroxy-3-(tert-butylamino)propyl] ethers (group II), substituents which are usual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medicinal chemistry 1986-02, Vol.29 (2), p.244-250
Hauptverfasser: CAMPBELL, J. K, LOGAN, R. T, MARSHALL, R. J, MCGARRY, G, SLEIGH, T, WINSLOW, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The antiarrhythmic efficacy of 17 beta-amino- and 17 beta-amino-16 alpha-hydroxyestratrien-3-ols and 3-acetates (group 1) was compared with the efficacy of corresponding 3-[2-hydroxy-3-(isopropylamino)propyl] and 3-[2-hydroxy-3-(tert-butylamino)propyl] ethers (group II), substituents which are usually associated with beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity. Group I compounds exerted potent antiarrhythmic activity against both aconitine-induced arrhythmias in mice and ischemia-induced arrhythmias in rats and reduced the maximum following frequency of isolated guinea pig atria. Electrophysiological studies indicated that their mechanism of action is due to an ability to reduce the fast inward sodium current in cardiac cells (class I antiarrhythmic action). Group II compounds were inactive in the aconitine and atrial tests and electrophysiological studies confirmed that they were devoid of class I activity. However, these compounds, like both class I antiarrhythmic and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, were active against ischemia-induced arrhythmias. Group II compounds, unlike group I compounds, exerted nonspecific beta-adrenoceptor blocking actions, which may account for their activity in the rat test. It was concluded that introduction of the 3-substituted ether group did not confer any advantage over the parent 3-ol or 3-acetate compounds.
ISSN:0022-2623
1520-4804
DOI:10.1021/jm00152a013