Informed Consent, Cancer, and Truth in Prognosis
To the Editor: Annas provides a thoughtful analysis of the Arato case (Jan. 20 issue), 1 in which physicians were sued for not informing a patient with pancreatic cancer of his prognosis. Since most Japanese doctors still withhold the truth from terminally ill patients, I became interested in how Am...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1994-09, Vol.331 (12), p.810-812 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Annas provides a thoughtful analysis of the Arato case (Jan. 20 issue),
1
in which physicians were sued for not informing a patient with pancreatic cancer of his prognosis. Since most Japanese doctors still withhold the truth from terminally ill patients, I became interested in how American physicians can be honest with patients. My interviews with American physicians surprised me, because I learned that they are not entirely candid with dying patients
2
. At least half those I interviewed said they deliver bad news to patients with the worst part (the prognosis) often left out and with an . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199409223311214 |