A study of the distribution of 7-ethoxycoumarin O-de-ethylase activity in human placental subcellular fractions
Human placental homogenates from maternal smokers and non-smokers were fractionated using differential centrifugation techniques. Yields of the various subfractions were determined and their homogeneity assessed using electron microscopic procedures. The distribution and response of 7-ethoxycoumarin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Placenta (Eastbourne) 1985-11, Vol.6 (6), p.481-495 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Human placental homogenates from maternal smokers and non-smokers were fractionated using differential centrifugation techniques. Yields of the various subfractions were determined and their homogeneity assessed using electron microscopic procedures. The distribution and response of 7-ethoxycoumarin
O-de-ethylase activity towards inhibition by dimethylsulphoxide, α-naphthoflavone and 9-hydroxyellipticine inhibitors in the placental subfractions were investigated. The low yield of microsomal protein obtained following differential centrifugation of placental homogenates (2.5±0.2 mg protein per g placenta) highlights the extremely refractory nature of human placental tissue towards homogenization.
Enzymic studies showed that the majority (75 per cent) of the original
O-de-ethylase activity in homogenates from smokers and non-smokers was to be found in the crude nuclear fraction. The 7-ethoxycoumarin
O-de-ethylase activity present in both homogenate and crude nuclear preparations from a maternal smoker was found to be inhibited by both α-naphthoflavone and 9-hydroxyellipticine to a lesser extent than the
O-de-ethylase activity which was present in both mitochondrial and microsomal fractions. While this observation suggests the existence of more than one induced
O-de-ethylase activity in the human placenta, the possibility that such differences in inhibitory response may be due to other factors (e.g. inhibitor solubility effects) cannot be excluded. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0143-4004 1532-3102 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0143-4004(85)80002-3 |