Hemodynamic and hemostatic responses to morning and evening exertion in systemic hypertension and implications for triggering of acute cardiovascular disease

The increased morning frequency of cardiovascular disease onset has created concern that morning exertion promotes greater risk than evening exertion. The physiologic responses to isometric exercise (handgrip) in the morning (9a.m.) versus the evening (6:30p.m.) were compared in 15 subjects with mil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1994-08, Vol.74 (3), p.253-257
Hauptverfasser: Jimenez, Alfredo H., Tofler, Geoffrey H., Chen, Xianghong, Stubbs, Miguel E., Solomon, Harold S., Muller, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The increased morning frequency of cardiovascular disease onset has created concern that morning exertion promotes greater risk than evening exertion. The physiologic responses to isometric exercise (handgrip) in the morning (9a.m.) versus the evening (6:30p.m.) were compared in 15 subjects with mild hypertension. Isometric exercise produced similar increases at both times of the day (morning vs evening) in systolic arterial pressure (31 ± 4 vs 35 ± 4 mm Hg, p = NS) and heart rate (7 ± 1 vs 8 ± 1 beats/min, p = NS). It also produced similar increases in fibrinolytic activity (reduction in euglobulin clot lysis time) at both times of the day (−53 ± 27 vs −53 ± 21 minutes). However, because basal fibrinolytic activity was lower in the morning than in the evening (euglobulin clot lysis time 364 ± 45 vs 220 ± 33 minutes, p < 0.01), peak fibrinolytic activity after stress was also lower in the morning (312 ± 44 vs 176 ± 27 minutes, p < 0.01). The present study demonstrates that in subjects with hypertension, the hemostatic and hemodynamic responses to handgrip are not greater during morning versus evening exertion. This finding, plus the overall benefits of regular exercise and the low absolute risk of an event during exercise, suggests that timing of exertion is not of critical importance. However, to obtain a definitive answer to this question, further studies are needed using different potential triggers and subject populations.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(94)90366-2