A comparison of pain experienced during hysterosalpingography and in-office falloposcopy

To determine patient perception of the intensity of pain during in-office falloposcopy compared with hysterosalpingography (HSG). A prospective quality assurance study using a formal pain scale to compare two procedures. Patients attending a tertiary level infertility clinic. In-office falloposcopy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 1994-07, Vol.62 (1), p.67-70
Hauptverfasser: Dunphy, Bruce, Taenzer, Paul, Bultz, Barry, Ingleson, Bev, Hartman, Dennis, Dodd, Colin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine patient perception of the intensity of pain during in-office falloposcopy compared with hysterosalpingography (HSG). A prospective quality assurance study using a formal pain scale to compare two procedures. Patients attending a tertiary level infertility clinic. In-office falloposcopy or HSG using analgesics. The mean pain score and area under the pain curve experienced during each investigation. Using our technique, in-office falloposcopy was associated with a significantly lower mean intensity of pain and with a longer procedure. The duration of the falloposcopic examination declined significantly with physician experience. Flushing adjacent to the uterotubal ostium, ostial cannulation, and rapid eversion provoked episodes of acute pain during falloposcopy. These results support the patient acceptability of in-office falloposcopy.
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56817-4