Evidence for Universality and Cultural Variation of Differential Emotion Response Patterning
The major controversy concerning psychobiological universality of differential emotion patterning versus cultural relativity of emotional experience is briefly reviewed. Data from a series of cross-cultural questionnaire studies in 37 countries on 5 continents are reported and used to evaluate the r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1994-02, Vol.66 (2), p.310-328 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The
major controversy concerning psychobiological universality of differential
emotion patterning versus cultural relativity of emotional experience is
briefly reviewed. Data from a series of cross-cultural questionnaire
studies in 37 countries on 5 continents are reported and used to evaluate
the respective claims of the proponents in the debate. Results show highly
significant main effects and strong effect sizes for the response
differences across 7 major emotions (joy, fear, anger, sadness, disgust,
shame, and guilt). Profiles of cross-culturally stable differences among
the emotions with respect to subjective feeling, physiological symptoms,
and expressive behavior are also reported. The empirical evidence is
interpreted as supporting theories that postulate both a high degree of
universality of differential emotion patterning and important cultural
differences in emotion elicitation, regulation, symbolic representation,
and social sharing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.310 |