Assessment of Childhood Depression, Anxiety, and Aggression: Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Self-, Parent-, Teacher-, and Peer-Report Measures

Childhood depression; anxiety, and aggression assessment instruments were examined in a sample of 8- to 11-year-old elementary school children. A multitrate-multimethod design was used to evaluate seIf-, parent-, teacher-, and peer-report on each of the three traits. Results found the measures exhib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality assessment 1994-04, Vol.62 (2), p.364-381
Hauptverfasser: Epkins, Catherine C., Meyers, Andrew W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Childhood depression; anxiety, and aggression assessment instruments were examined in a sample of 8- to 11-year-old elementary school children. A multitrate-multimethod design was used to evaluate seIf-, parent-, teacher-, and peer-report on each of the three traits. Results found the measures exhibited significant convergent and discriminant validity for both boys and girls. However, different patterns in convergence among the information sources emerged between boys and girls. Both the intercorrelations and the analyses of variance documented significant method variance. The implications of the high method variance or source bias in the assessment process are discussed. It is argued that investigators employ confirmatory factor analyses in evaluation of multitrait-multimethod data.
ISSN:0022-3891
1532-7752
DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_16