Organizational assessment in general practice: a systematic review and implications for quality improvement

Background  Quality improvement of organizational aspects in general practice is receiving increasing attention. In particular, the impact of effective organization on preventative care has been recognized. Organizational assessments are typically used as part of professionally led accreditation sch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2005-08, Vol.11 (4), p.366-378
Hauptverfasser: Rhydderch, Melody, Edwards, Adrian, Elwyn, Glyn, Marshall, Martin, Engels, Yvonne, Van den Hombergh, Pieter, Grol, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background  Quality improvement of organizational aspects in general practice is receiving increasing attention. In particular, the impact of effective organization on preventative care has been recognized. Organizational assessments are typically used as part of professionally led accreditation schemes where there is a tension between externally led quality assurance and internally led quality improvement. The aim of this article is to inform the debate by reviewing the international‐peer‐reviewed literature on organizational assessments used in  general  practice  settings.   Design  Systematic literature review. Methods  The literature was searched for articles relating to organizational assessment. Titles and s were examined by two independent reviewers and relevant articles obtained. Bibliographies were examined for follow‐up references. Data were extracted on the development and use of assessment methods. Results  Thirteen papers describing five organizational assessment instruments were included for detailed appraisal. Conclusion  This review discovered a developing field containing different approaches to the measurement of organizational aspects of general practice. Whilst professionally led accreditation is well‐developed and dependent on externally led quality assurance, approaches to internally led quality improvement are less well‐developed. There is a need for organizational assessment tools designed for the purpose of stimulating internal development.
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00544.x