Prematurity prevention programs: An analysis of successes and failures

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the long-term results of established prematurity prevention programs. STUDY DESIGN: A population cohort of pregnant women from two major urban health care organizations were examined. Rates and cost-benefit analysis of prematurity and patient, system, or physicia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1994-03, Vol.170 (3), p.744-750
Hauptverfasser: Fangman, John J., Mark, Peter M., Pratt, Leslie, Conway, Kathleen K., Healey, Margaret L., Oswald, John W., Uden, Donald L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the long-term results of established prematurity prevention programs. STUDY DESIGN: A population cohort of pregnant women from two major urban health care organizations were examined. Rates and cost-benefit analysis of prematurity and patient, system, or physician failures were analyzed. During 1990 1143 pregnant women were prospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 11.8% of the mothers were high risk and responsible for 108 (50.2%) of the preterm deliveries. The preterm birth rate of all enrollees was 4.6%. One percent of the preterm neonates required level III care for complications. The average charge for a 35 week infant was 18 times, and a 36 week infant was five times more costly than a term infant. Patient, physician, and health care system failures occurred at different rates. CONCLUSIONS: This preterm prevention program resulted in low preterm birth rates. Potentially preventable preterm births most often occurred as a result of patient and physician failures. (AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1994;170:744-50.)
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70275-6