Medication administration: does the teaching method really matter?

Do teaching methods affect students' performance of medication administration? This study was conducted to ascertain if there was a difference in baccalaureate nursing students' ability to accurately administer medication when taught using a faculty-assisted (control group) method versus a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nursing education 1998-09, Vol.37 (6), p.281-283
Hauptverfasser: Powell, S S, Canterbury, M A, McCoy, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Do teaching methods affect students' performance of medication administration? This study was conducted to ascertain if there was a difference in baccalaureate nursing students' ability to accurately administer medication when taught using a faculty-assisted (control group) method versus a self-directed (experimental group) method. Student performance in medication administration was measured 1 week post laboratory practice using a 17-item instrument developed by the faculty. Students (N = 98) were randomly assigned to the faculty-assisted group or the self-directed group. The difference between the two groups was in the method of laboratory instruction. Students (n = 50) in the control group received faculty instruction on the skill performance during the laboratory practice. Students (n = 48) in the experimental group viewed a faculty-generated videotape on medication administration prior to laboratory practice. Performance evaluations were completed 1 week after the laboratory practice. Analysis of the data using a two-tailed t test for independent samples showed no significant difference (p < .05) between the two groups.
ISSN:0148-4834
1938-2421
DOI:10.3928/0148-4834-19980901-15