Controlled Comparison of Radio Wave Regional Hyperthermia and Peritoneal Lavage Rewarming after Immersion Hypothermia

Anesthetized random source dogs were cooled by ice-water immersion to a stable core temperature of 25° C and subsequently rewarmed with normal saline peritoneal lavage (43° C, 175 ml/kg/hr) or radio frequency electromagnetic-induced regional hyperthermia (4–6 watts/kg). The mean time required for co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of trauma 1985-10, Vol.25 (10), p.989-993
Hauptverfasser: WHITE, J. DOUGLAS, BUTTERFIELD, ARTHUR B., GREER, KATHRYN A., SCHOEM, SCOTT, JOHNSON, CLYDE, HOLLOWAY, ROBERT R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Anesthetized random source dogs were cooled by ice-water immersion to a stable core temperature of 25° C and subsequently rewarmed with normal saline peritoneal lavage (43° C, 175 ml/kg/hr) or radio frequency electromagnetic-induced regional hyperthermia (4–6 watts/kg). The mean time required for core rewarming to 30° C was 183 ± 79 minutes for lavage and 58 ± 13 minutes for radio wave therapy (p < 0.01). There was no evidence of tissue damage with either modality. These data suggest radio wave regional hyperthermia is superior to peritoneal lavage for core rewarming of rapidly induced immersion hypothermia.
ISSN:0022-5282
1529-8809
DOI:10.1097/00005373-198510000-00011