Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: A population-based case-control study among births in Washington State

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to quantify the magnitude of risk associated with conditions resulting in umbilical cord prolapse and adverse infant outcome after cord prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based case-control study used birth certificate data from 709 cases and 2407 randomly selected contr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1994-02, Vol.170 (2), p.613-618
Hauptverfasser: Critchlow, Cathy W., Leet, Terry L., Benedetti, Thomas J., Daling, Janet R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to quantify the magnitude of risk associated with conditions resulting in umbilical cord prolapse and adverse infant outcome after cord prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based case-control study used birth certificate data from 709 cases and 2407 randomly selected controls. Odds ratios were used as measures of association, with stratification performed to control for confounding. RESULTS: Case infants were more likely to weigh < 2500 gm (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 3.7 to 6.2) and to be born prematurely (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 3.7). Other risk factors were breech presentation (birth weight - adjusted odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.9) and being a second-born twin (odds ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 11.7). Subsequent adverse infant outcomes included an increased risk of mortality (relative risk 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.0), with mortality being less likely to occur among cases delivered by cesarean section (relative risk 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.6). CONCLUSION: This study confirms previously suspected risk factors and supports clinical management of cord prolapse by cesarean section delivery. (AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1994;170:613-8.)
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70238-1