The Domain Structure of Sigma 54 as Determined by Analysis of a Set of Deletion Mutants

Escherichia coli σ54 was analyzed by making a series of 16 internal deletions within its gene and analyzing the properties of the mutant proteins. All of the mutant proteins except one were strongly defective in a growth test that relied on σ54 function. Additional assays were applied to determine t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular biology 1994-02, Vol.236 (1), p.81-90
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Cai'ne, Tintut, Yin, Gralla, Jay D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Escherichia coli σ54 was analyzed by making a series of 16 internal deletions within its gene and analyzing the properties of the mutant proteins. All of the mutant proteins except one were strongly defective in a growth test that relied on σ54 function. Additional assays were applied to determine the causes of these defects. The assays monitored the following properties; the level of protein expression; ability to bind to the -24 promoter element of the glnAP2 promoter in vivo; the ability to bind to the -12 promoter element in vivo; ability to melt the promoter start site in vivo; ability to bind the Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoter in vitro; and the ability to form a sigma 54-core RNA polymerase complex (Eσ54 holoenzyme) in vitro. The analysis shows a modular structure in that certain regions of the protein predominate in contributing to each of these properties. A large carboxyl region of the protein is essential for promoter binding. A smaller amino-terminal segment is essential for DNA melting. An element essential for the forming the Eσ54 holoenzyme lies between these two regions. None of these domains resemble those of σ70 and this difference is discussed in view of the different transcription mechanisms directed by the two proteins.
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
DOI:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1120