Phylogenetic Studies in the Monocot Subclass Alismatidae: Evidence for a Reappraisal of the Aquatic Order Najadales
Within the angiosperm subclass Alismatidae (= superorder Alismatiflorae), contemporary taxonomists have often assigned the families Hydrocharitaceae and Najadaceae to different orders. The Najadaceae are presumably allied to a variety of aquatic families in the order Najadales, whereas the Hydrochar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 1993-12, Vol.2 (4), p.304-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Within the angiosperm subclass Alismatidae (= superorder Alismatiflorae), contemporary taxonomists have often assigned the families Hydrocharitaceae and Najadaceae to different orders. The Najadaceae are presumably allied to a variety of aquatic families in the order Najadales, whereas the Hydrocharitaceae have been segregated as the order Hydrocharitales or placed within the order Alismatales. Analyses of DNA sequence data from the chloroplast gene
rbcL, however, indicate that Najadaceae have a much closer phylogenetic relationship to Hydrocharitaceae than to families of the "Najadales" (Cymodoceaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Ruppiaceae, Scheuchzeriaceae, Zannichelliaceae, Zosteraceae). This association supports previous studies based upon examination of floral structure and seed coat anatomy. The
rbcL sequence data also indicate that the Zosteraceae and Potamogetonaceae are closely related families. The
rbcL sequence of
Zostera is actually more similar to that of
Potamogeton richardsonii than is the sequence of the latter to a congener,
Potamogeton amplifolius. The marine, dioecious, hydrophilous genus
Zostera has acquired a number of distinctive adaptations, but probably diverged relatively rapidly from freshwater Potamogetonaceae. Molecular data place Ruppiaceae as a sister group to the marine Cymodoceaceae and do not support the commonly accepted merger of Ruppiaceae and Potamogetonaceae. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-7903 1095-9513 |
DOI: | 10.1006/mpev.1993.1029 |