Hedonic interactions of medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis

It has been shown that ‘pure reward’ and ‘reward-escape’ sites in the lateral hypothalamus (LH) of rats respectively ameliorate and exacerbate nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NGC) stimulation-induced aversion 52. Conversely, the present studies found that ‘rewarding’ medial prefrontal cortex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 1989-04, Vol.483 (2), p.233-250
Hauptverfasser: Miserendino, Mindy J.D., Coons, Edgar C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It has been shown that ‘pure reward’ and ‘reward-escape’ sites in the lateral hypothalamus (LH) of rats respectively ameliorate and exacerbate nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NGC) stimulation-induced aversion 52. Conversely, the present studies found that ‘rewarding’ medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) stimulation increased escape from NGC stimulation regardless of whether the MPFC site tested was ‘pure reward’ or ‘reward-escape’ in type. This suggested that a simple algebraic summation model of positive and negative affective processes may not adequately describe the NGC-MPFC interaction. In a subsequent study, rats were observed both to barpress less to obtain, and more to escape from, ‘rewarding’ MPFC stimulation during continuous NGC stimulation, supporting the hypothesis that the observed MPFC stimulation-mediated increase in NGC stimulation escape reflected an exacerbation of aversion. Finally, NGC stimulation was seen to increase barpressing to obtain ‘subreward’ MPFC current trains, indicating a potentiation of the reward value of such current. Results of this series of studies suggests a hedonic interaction model of NGC and MPFC characterized by reciprocal neuromodulation. The model is conceptuallized as a ‘neural opponent process’ subserving affective ‘balance’ and ‘feature enhancement’, and its possible relevance to the putative role of the MPFC in cocaine use is discussed.
ISSN:0006-8993
1872-6240
DOI:10.1016/0006-8993(89)90168-6