Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Versus Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Catheter ablation is a promising therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its utility in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is uncertain. The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies comparing the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2010-11, Vol.106 (9), p.1284-1291
Hauptverfasser: Wilton, Stephen B., MD, Fundytus, Adam, Ghali, William A., MD, MPH, Veenhuyzen, George D., MD, Quinn, F. Russell, BM, BCh, PhD, Mitchell, L. Brent, MD, Hill, Michael D., MD, MSc, Faris, Peter, PhD, Exner, Derek V., MD, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Catheter ablation is a promising therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its utility in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is uncertain. The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies comparing the rates of recurrent AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), and complications after AF catheter ablation in those with versus without LVSD and to summarize the impact of catheter ablation on the left ventricular ejection fraction. Seven observational studies and 1 randomized trial were included (total n = 1,851). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 27 months. In those with LVSD, 28% to 55% were free of AF or AT on follow-up after 1 AF catheter ablation, increasing to 64% to 96% after a mean of 1.4 procedures. The relative risk for recurrent AF or AT in those with versus without LVSD was 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.8, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.053