Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty
From 1981 through 1991, 3, 032 primary total knee arthroplasties were performed using the Insall-Burstein Posterior Stabilized Condylar Prosthesis (IB-I, IB-II, and IB-II modified) (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). Fifteen posterior dislocations occurred: 4 with the IB-I system occurring 2 or more years after s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 1993, Vol.8 (6), p.633-639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 639 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 633 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Lombardi, Adolph V. Mallory, Thomas H. Vaughn, Bradley K. Krugel, Richard Honkala, Timothy K. Sorscher, Michael Kolczun, Michael |
description | From 1981 through 1991, 3, 032 primary total knee arthroplasties were performed using the Insall-Burstein Posterior Stabilized Condylar Prosthesis (IB-I, IB-II, and IB-II modified) (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). Fifteen posterior dislocations occurred: 4 with the IB-I system occurring 2 or more years after surgery, 10 with the IB-II system (8 occurring 6 months after surgery and 2 occurring 2–3 years after surgery), and 1 with the IB-II modified system occurring 9 months after surgery. Statistically significant differences for the rate of dislocation between both the IB-I and IB-II modified arthroplasties versus the IB-II arthroplasties were found (
P < .001). In an attempt to identify a cause for these dislocations, the authors retrospectively assessed the 15 dislocated cases with respect to sex, age, weight, height, preoperative and postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery scores, preoperative and postoperative alignment, preoperative versus postoperative reconstruction dimensions, patellar thickness and height, and postoperative flexion and compared the results with those patients who did not experience dislocation. Possible etiologies and mechanisms of dislocation were sought. There were no significant differences between the control and study groups for any variable assessed, with the exception of postoperative flexion, which averaged 118° for the study group and 105° for the control group (
P < .001). Conservative management was successful in 11 cases. In September 1988 the IB-II system was introduced; modification of the tibial insert was made in January 1990. The 10 IB-II dislocations occurred prior to the modification of the modular tibial polyethylene insert, and the 3 recurrent dislocations in this group were successfully treated with revision to this modified insert. Since this modification, 656 IB-II modified systems have been implanted with one dislocation (0.15%). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0883-5403(93)90012-S |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76213255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>088354039390012S</els_id><sourcerecordid>76213255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-930537f2108ab6c7f4857734c6742669ce9e35bc78b61ef3be2128c5f2dccb883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo67r6DxR6Ej1Uk6ZJ24sg6zcLHlbPIU2nGs02Nckq6683y5Y9CgM5zDMzeR-Ejgm-IJjwS1yWNGU5pmcVPa8wJlk630FjwmiWljnmu2i8RfbRgfcfkSGM5SM0KmnESzpGTzfaG6tk0LZLWmuM_dHdW9I7vZBulfTWB3DautQHWWujf6FJgg3SJJ8dQCJdeHe2N9KH1SHaa6XxcDS8E_R6d_syfUhnz_eP0-tZqigvQlpRzGjRZgSXsuaqaPOSFQXNFS_yjPNKQQWU1aooa06gpTVk8auKtVmjVB0DTdDpZm_v7NcSfBAL7RUYIzuwSy8KnhGaMRbBfAMqZ7130IohliBYrBWKtR-x9iOqWGuFYh7HTob9y3oBzXZocBb7V5s-xJDfGpzwSkOnoNEOVBCN1f8f-ANGRIFG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76213255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lombardi, Adolph V. ; Mallory, Thomas H. ; Vaughn, Bradley K. ; Krugel, Richard ; Honkala, Timothy K. ; Sorscher, Michael ; Kolczun, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Adolph V. ; Mallory, Thomas H. ; Vaughn, Bradley K. ; Krugel, Richard ; Honkala, Timothy K. ; Sorscher, Michael ; Kolczun, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>From 1981 through 1991, 3, 032 primary total knee arthroplasties were performed using the Insall-Burstein Posterior Stabilized Condylar Prosthesis (IB-I, IB-II, and IB-II modified) (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). Fifteen posterior dislocations occurred: 4 with the IB-I system occurring 2 or more years after surgery, 10 with the IB-II system (8 occurring 6 months after surgery and 2 occurring 2–3 years after surgery), and 1 with the IB-II modified system occurring 9 months after surgery. Statistically significant differences for the rate of dislocation between both the IB-I and IB-II modified arthroplasties versus the IB-II arthroplasties were found (
P < .001). In an attempt to identify a cause for these dislocations, the authors retrospectively assessed the 15 dislocated cases with respect to sex, age, weight, height, preoperative and postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery scores, preoperative and postoperative alignment, preoperative versus postoperative reconstruction dimensions, patellar thickness and height, and postoperative flexion and compared the results with those patients who did not experience dislocation. Possible etiologies and mechanisms of dislocation were sought. There were no significant differences between the control and study groups for any variable assessed, with the exception of postoperative flexion, which averaged 118° for the study group and 105° for the control group (
P < .001). Conservative management was successful in 11 cases. In September 1988 the IB-II system was introduced; modification of the tibial insert was made in January 1990. The 10 IB-II dislocations occurred prior to the modification of the modular tibial polyethylene insert, and the 3 recurrent dislocations in this group were successfully treated with revision to this modified insert. Since this modification, 656 IB-II modified systems have been implanted with one dislocation (0.15%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(93)90012-S</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8301283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; dislocation ; Female ; Humans ; Joint Dislocations - diagnostic imaging ; Joint Dislocations - etiology ; Joint Dislocations - surgery ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Male ; posterior-stabilized components ; posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty ; Prosthesis Design ; Radiography ; Risk Factors ; total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 1993, Vol.8 (6), p.633-639</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-930537f2108ab6c7f4857734c6742669ce9e35bc78b61ef3be2128c5f2dccb883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-930537f2108ab6c7f4857734c6742669ce9e35bc78b61ef3be2128c5f2dccb883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/088354039390012S$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8301283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Adolph V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallory, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Bradley K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krugel, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkala, Timothy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorscher, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolczun, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>From 1981 through 1991, 3, 032 primary total knee arthroplasties were performed using the Insall-Burstein Posterior Stabilized Condylar Prosthesis (IB-I, IB-II, and IB-II modified) (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). Fifteen posterior dislocations occurred: 4 with the IB-I system occurring 2 or more years after surgery, 10 with the IB-II system (8 occurring 6 months after surgery and 2 occurring 2–3 years after surgery), and 1 with the IB-II modified system occurring 9 months after surgery. Statistically significant differences for the rate of dislocation between both the IB-I and IB-II modified arthroplasties versus the IB-II arthroplasties were found (
P < .001). In an attempt to identify a cause for these dislocations, the authors retrospectively assessed the 15 dislocated cases with respect to sex, age, weight, height, preoperative and postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery scores, preoperative and postoperative alignment, preoperative versus postoperative reconstruction dimensions, patellar thickness and height, and postoperative flexion and compared the results with those patients who did not experience dislocation. Possible etiologies and mechanisms of dislocation were sought. There were no significant differences between the control and study groups for any variable assessed, with the exception of postoperative flexion, which averaged 118° for the study group and 105° for the control group (
P < .001). Conservative management was successful in 11 cases. In September 1988 the IB-II system was introduced; modification of the tibial insert was made in January 1990. The 10 IB-II dislocations occurred prior to the modification of the modular tibial polyethylene insert, and the 3 recurrent dislocations in this group were successfully treated with revision to this modified insert. Since this modification, 656 IB-II modified systems have been implanted with one dislocation (0.15%).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>dislocation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Dislocations - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joint Dislocations - etiology</subject><subject>Joint Dislocations - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>posterior-stabilized components</subject><subject>posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo67r6DxR6Ej1Uk6ZJ24sg6zcLHlbPIU2nGs02Nckq6683y5Y9CgM5zDMzeR-Ejgm-IJjwS1yWNGU5pmcVPa8wJlk630FjwmiWljnmu2i8RfbRgfcfkSGM5SM0KmnESzpGTzfaG6tk0LZLWmuM_dHdW9I7vZBulfTWB3DautQHWWujf6FJgg3SJJ8dQCJdeHe2N9KH1SHaa6XxcDS8E_R6d_syfUhnz_eP0-tZqigvQlpRzGjRZgSXsuaqaPOSFQXNFS_yjPNKQQWU1aooa06gpTVk8auKtVmjVB0DTdDpZm_v7NcSfBAL7RUYIzuwSy8KnhGaMRbBfAMqZ7130IohliBYrBWKtR-x9iOqWGuFYh7HTob9y3oBzXZocBb7V5s-xJDfGpzwSkOnoNEOVBCN1f8f-ANGRIFG</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>Lombardi, Adolph V.</creator><creator>Mallory, Thomas H.</creator><creator>Vaughn, Bradley K.</creator><creator>Krugel, Richard</creator><creator>Honkala, Timothy K.</creator><creator>Sorscher, Michael</creator><creator>Kolczun, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty</title><author>Lombardi, Adolph V. ; Mallory, Thomas H. ; Vaughn, Bradley K. ; Krugel, Richard ; Honkala, Timothy K. ; Sorscher, Michael ; Kolczun, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-930537f2108ab6c7f4857734c6742669ce9e35bc78b61ef3be2128c5f2dccb883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>dislocation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Dislocations - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joint Dislocations - etiology</topic><topic>Joint Dislocations - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>posterior-stabilized components</topic><topic>posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Adolph V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallory, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Bradley K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krugel, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkala, Timothy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorscher, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolczun, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lombardi, Adolph V.</au><au>Mallory, Thomas H.</au><au>Vaughn, Bradley K.</au><au>Krugel, Richard</au><au>Honkala, Timothy K.</au><au>Sorscher, Michael</au><au>Kolczun, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>633-639</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>From 1981 through 1991, 3, 032 primary total knee arthroplasties were performed using the Insall-Burstein Posterior Stabilized Condylar Prosthesis (IB-I, IB-II, and IB-II modified) (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). Fifteen posterior dislocations occurred: 4 with the IB-I system occurring 2 or more years after surgery, 10 with the IB-II system (8 occurring 6 months after surgery and 2 occurring 2–3 years after surgery), and 1 with the IB-II modified system occurring 9 months after surgery. Statistically significant differences for the rate of dislocation between both the IB-I and IB-II modified arthroplasties versus the IB-II arthroplasties were found (
P < .001). In an attempt to identify a cause for these dislocations, the authors retrospectively assessed the 15 dislocated cases with respect to sex, age, weight, height, preoperative and postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery scores, preoperative and postoperative alignment, preoperative versus postoperative reconstruction dimensions, patellar thickness and height, and postoperative flexion and compared the results with those patients who did not experience dislocation. Possible etiologies and mechanisms of dislocation were sought. There were no significant differences between the control and study groups for any variable assessed, with the exception of postoperative flexion, which averaged 118° for the study group and 105° for the control group (
P < .001). Conservative management was successful in 11 cases. In September 1988 the IB-II system was introduced; modification of the tibial insert was made in January 1990. The 10 IB-II dislocations occurred prior to the modification of the modular tibial polyethylene insert, and the 3 recurrent dislocations in this group were successfully treated with revision to this modified insert. Since this modification, 656 IB-II modified systems have been implanted with one dislocation (0.15%).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8301283</pmid><doi>10.1016/0883-5403(93)90012-S</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 1993, Vol.8 (6), p.633-639 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76213255 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged dislocation Female Humans Joint Dislocations - diagnostic imaging Joint Dislocations - etiology Joint Dislocations - surgery Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Male posterior-stabilized components posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty Prosthesis Design Radiography Risk Factors total knee arthroplasty |
title | Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dislocation%20following%20primary%20posterior-stabilized%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Lombardi,%20Adolph%20V.&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=633-639&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0883-5403(93)90012-S&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76213255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76213255&rft_id=info:pmid/8301283&rft_els_id=088354039390012S&rfr_iscdi=true |