A comparison of athletic mouthguard materials
The development of protective mouthguards resulted from extensive injuries during participation in contact sports. This has produced a dramatic decrease in the incidence of injuries to the orofacial complex. Numerous materials and techniques have been used for mouth guard fabrication. The purpose of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 1985-05, Vol.13 (3), p.193-197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The development of protective mouthguards resulted from extensive injuries during participation in contact sports. This has
produced a dramatic decrease in the incidence of injuries to the orofacial complex. Numerous materials and techniques have
been used for mouth guard fabrication. The purpose of this investigation was to make an in vivo comparison of various thermoplastic
mouthguard materials.
Mouthguards were fabricated upon maxillary models of 40 members of the UCLA football team. The mouth guards were made of the
following materials: (1) poly (vinyl acetate-ethylene) copolymer clear thermoplastic; (2) polyurethane; and (3) laminated
thermoplastic. Eleven measurements were taken for each mouthguard to demonstrate dimensional changes that occurred with wear.
Statistical analyses determined differences be tween the types of mouthguards.
The clear thermoplastic revealed less dimensional change than the polyurethane material. The laminated thermoplastic showed
significantly less dimensional change than the other materials tested. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/036354658501300309 |