Electrophoretic Mobility—Ionic Strength Studies of Proteins. I. Heterogeneity of Human Serum Albumin.

Summary and Conclusions 1. The ionic strength-electrophoretic mobility relationship of human serum albumin was studied at pH 4.0 in acetate-NaCl buffer over a wide range of ionic strength values. 2. A 5% albumin solution which gave a single boundary at pH 8.6 in barbiturate buffer, 0.1 ionic strengt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) N.J.), 1954-05, Vol.86 (1), p.46-53
Hauptverfasser: Saifer, Abraham, Corey, Harold
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary and Conclusions 1. The ionic strength-electrophoretic mobility relationship of human serum albumin was studied at pH 4.0 in acetate-NaCl buffer over a wide range of ionic strength values. 2. A 5% albumin solution which gave a single boundary at pH 8.6 in barbiturate buffer, 0.1 ionic strength, showed separation into a number of ascending boundaries at an ionic strength of 0.005. 3. Similarly at pH 4.0 in acetate-NaCl buffer, the number of ascending boundaries increases from 2 to 5 as the ionic strength is decreased from 0.2 to 0.02. Under these conditions, the area under the fastest moving peak increases continuously at the expense of the slower-moving peak adjacent to it. 4. Using an ionic strength of 0.03 (pH 4.0) as a standard condition, since it gives 4 clearly resolved boundaries, various other factors which may influence the electrophoretic pattern were studied, e.g., protein concentration, method of preparation of albumin fraction, time of run, and technic of dialysis used. 5. Reproducible values for the areas under each of the 4 peaks were obtained at protein concentrations between 1 to 5% and with mechanical dialysis for 5 hours or longer at 25° against the acetate-NaCl buffer, 0.03 ionic strength. 6. Preliminary work would indicate that the electrophoretic sub-fractionation of other proteins or protein fractions, e.g., gamma globulin, is also possible and that this behavior may be part of a more generalized phenomena. 7. The possible explanation of these phenomena await quantitative analysis of the components present under each observed peak. However, evidence is presented that boundaries probably represent protein components and not artefacts.
ISSN:0037-9727
1535-3702
1535-3699
DOI:10.3181/00379727-86-21008