Human Contingency Judgments: Rule Based or Associative?
The study of the mechanism that detects the contingency between events, in both humans and non-human animals, is a matter of considerable research activity. Two broad categories of explanations of the acquisition of contingency information have received extensive evaluation: rule-based models and as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 1993-11, Vol.114 (3), p.435-448 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The study of the mechanism that detects the contingency between events, in both humans and non-human animals, is a matter of considerable research activity. Two broad categories of explanations of the acquisition of contingency information have received extensive evaluation: rule-based models and associative models. This article assesses the two categories of models for human contingency judgments. The data reveal systematic departures in contingency judgments from the predictions of rule-based models. Recent studies indicate that a contiguity model of Pavlovian conditioning is a useful heuristic for conceptualizing human contingency judgments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.435 |