Endodontic anesthesia in mandibular molars: A clinical study
Sixty-one mandibular molar teeth with clinically manifest pulpitis, which required endodontic therapy, were studied. Twenty-seven subjects received standard inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% lidocaine HCI with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 34 subjects received IANB with 3% mepivacaine with no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 1993-07, Vol.19 (7), p.370-373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sixty-one mandibular molar teeth with clinically manifest pulpitis, which required endodontic therapy, were studied. Twenty-seven subjects received standard inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% lidocaine HCI with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 34 subjects received IANB with 3% mepivacaine with no vasoconstrictor. Pulpal anesthesia was assessed with dichlorodifluormethane (DDM). Subjects who gave a positive response to DDM were given a periodontal ligament injection with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
This study showed that 3% mepivacaine HCI is as effective as 2% lidocaine HCI in achieving pulpal anesthesia in mandibular molars with IANB. Of a total 61 IANB with lip anesthesia, 23 subjects required peridontal ligament injection to achieve a negative response to DDM.
It was concluded that lip anesthesia is not a reliable indicator of pulpal anesthesia. The use of DDM is a reliable method of determining true pulpal anesthesia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81366-X |