Is surgery necessary for abdominal aortic aneurysm less than 6 cm in diameter?
During 8 years of an ultrasound screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), 8944 people aged 65–80 years were scanned. 356 (4%) had AAA of diameter 3 cm or greater. Under our criteria repair was indicated if the aortic diameter reached 6 cm, if expansion reached 1 cm per year, or if the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 1993-12, Vol.342 (8884), p.1395-1396 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | During 8 years of an ultrasound screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), 8944 people aged 65–80 years were scanned. 356 (4%) had AAA of diameter 3 cm or greater. Under our criteria repair was indicated if the aortic diameter reached 6 cm, if expansion reached 1 cm per year, or if the AAA caused symptoms; 124 patients met these criteria. Among the 8820 screened patients who did not meet the criteria. 1 death (0·4%) was attributed to ruptured aneurysm, although the retroperitoneal haematoma had developed within 5 days of surgery for a colon tumour. The risj of aortic rupture in patients with AAA less than 6 cm diameter with these criteria (0·4%) is lower than that for elective surgery (1–8%). Surgical repair is unnecessary and possibly detrimental in such patients, provided that ultrasound surveillance is undertaken. Lancet 1993; 342: 1395–96 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92756-J |