Is surgery necessary for abdominal aortic aneurysm less than 6 cm in diameter?

During 8 years of an ultrasound screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), 8944 people aged 65–80 years were scanned. 356 (4%) had AAA of diameter 3 cm or greater. Under our criteria repair was indicated if the aortic diameter reached 6 cm, if expansion reached 1 cm per year, or if the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1993-12, Vol.342 (8884), p.1395-1396
Hauptverfasser: Scott, R.A.P., Wilson, N.M., Ashton, H.A., Kay, D.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During 8 years of an ultrasound screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), 8944 people aged 65–80 years were scanned. 356 (4%) had AAA of diameter 3 cm or greater. Under our criteria repair was indicated if the aortic diameter reached 6 cm, if expansion reached 1 cm per year, or if the AAA caused symptoms; 124 patients met these criteria. Among the 8820 screened patients who did not meet the criteria. 1 death (0·4%) was attributed to ruptured aneurysm, although the retroperitoneal haematoma had developed within 5 days of surgery for a colon tumour. The risj of aortic rupture in patients with AAA less than 6 cm diameter with these criteria (0·4%) is lower than that for elective surgery (1–8%). Surgical repair is unnecessary and possibly detrimental in such patients, provided that ultrasound surveillance is undertaken. Lancet 1993; 342: 1395–96
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92756-J