Biomechanical Stress Distribution on Fixation Screws Used in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Assessment of 9 Methods via Finite Element Method
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods A 3-dimensiona...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2010-11, Vol.68 (11), p.2765-2769 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2769 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2765 |
container_title | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Bohluli, Behnam, DMD Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS |
description | Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods A 3-dimensional computerized model of a human mandible with posterior teeth was generated. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was virtually performed on this model. The separated model was assembled with 9 fixation methods: single screw, 2 screws one behind the other, 2 screws one below the other, 3 screws in an L configuration, 3 screws in an inverted backward L configuration, miniplate with 2 screws, miniplate with 4 screws, 2 parallel plates (upper + lower border), and square miniplate with 4 screws. Then, 75-, 135-, and 600-N vertical loads were applied on the posterior teeth of these models. The stress distribution on the screw sites on the buccal cortex was measured by the finite element method. Results In this model all the fixation methods withstood forces between 75 and 135 N. However, the single-screw and the 2-hole miniplate models showed that the stress distributions in the configurations were intolerable when 600 N of posterior force was applied. The results of this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable. Conclusion Although this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable pattern, most of the patterns had adequate stability for clinical applications (mean, 125 N). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760233598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239110003459</els_id><sourcerecordid>760233598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-c20d49e88b95c5437f4721667d1ada2f08c35e53097656406e728500924c06203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEokvhBTggXxCnXcZ27CQIIbWlBaSiSiw9W15nQr0k8eJx2u6b8LgkuwtIHJAs2fL8_29rvsmy5xwWHLh-vV6sQ0cLAeMFyAXw_EE240ryuQIlH2YzEEU5F7LiR9kTojUA56rQj7MjAQWUkhez7OepDx26G9t7Z1u2TBGJ2HtPKfrVkHzo2bgu_L3dnZcu4h2xa8Ka-Z6d-tYmjJPRfvMpTYdN6xP7YruB2BUlDCl02zfshGgM7rBPLDSsYp8x3YSa2K23Y3rvE7LzFnf1felp9qixLeGzw36cXV-cfz37OL-8-vDp7ORy7vIc0twJqPMKy3JVKadyWTR5IbjWRc1tbUUDpZMKlYSq0ErnoLEQpQKoRO5AC5DH2at97iaGHwNSMp0nh21rewwDmUKDkFJV5agUe6WLgShiYzbRdzZuDQczATFrMwExExAD0oxARtOLQ_yw6rD-Y_lNYBS8PAgsjQSaaHvn6a9OykJrPr3-dq_DsRm3HqMh57F3WPuILpk6-P__490_dtf6HfPvuEVahyH2Y5sNNyQMmOU0OtPkcACQuarkL6p6vl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>760233598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Stress Distribution on Fixation Screws Used in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Assessment of 9 Methods via Finite Element Method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD ; Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS ; Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD ; Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD ; Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD ; Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD ; Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS ; Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD ; Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD ; Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD ; Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods A 3-dimensional computerized model of a human mandible with posterior teeth was generated. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was virtually performed on this model. The separated model was assembled with 9 fixation methods: single screw, 2 screws one behind the other, 2 screws one below the other, 3 screws in an L configuration, 3 screws in an inverted backward L configuration, miniplate with 2 screws, miniplate with 4 screws, 2 parallel plates (upper + lower border), and square miniplate with 4 screws. Then, 75-, 135-, and 600-N vertical loads were applied on the posterior teeth of these models. The stress distribution on the screw sites on the buccal cortex was measured by the finite element method. Results In this model all the fixation methods withstood forces between 75 and 135 N. However, the single-screw and the 2-hole miniplate models showed that the stress distributions in the configurations were intolerable when 600 N of posterior force was applied. The results of this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable. Conclusion Although this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable pattern, most of the patterns had adequate stability for clinical applications (mean, 125 N).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20708317</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bicuspid - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics. Biorheology ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Computer Simulation ; Dentistry ; Equipment Design ; Finite Element Analysis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Mandible - surgery ; Mandibular Condyle - physiology ; Materials Testing ; Medical sciences ; Models, Biological ; Molar - physiology ; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteotomy - instrumentation ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2010-11, Vol.68 (11), p.2765-2769</ispartof><rights>American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-c20d49e88b95c5437f4721667d1ada2f08c35e53097656406e728500924c06203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-c20d49e88b95c5437f4721667d1ada2f08c35e53097656406e728500924c06203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239110003459$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23376618$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Stress Distribution on Fixation Screws Used in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Assessment of 9 Methods via Finite Element Method</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods A 3-dimensional computerized model of a human mandible with posterior teeth was generated. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was virtually performed on this model. The separated model was assembled with 9 fixation methods: single screw, 2 screws one behind the other, 2 screws one below the other, 3 screws in an L configuration, 3 screws in an inverted backward L configuration, miniplate with 2 screws, miniplate with 4 screws, 2 parallel plates (upper + lower border), and square miniplate with 4 screws. Then, 75-, 135-, and 600-N vertical loads were applied on the posterior teeth of these models. The stress distribution on the screw sites on the buccal cortex was measured by the finite element method. Results In this model all the fixation methods withstood forces between 75 and 135 N. However, the single-screw and the 2-hole miniplate models showed that the stress distributions in the configurations were intolerable when 600 N of posterior force was applied. The results of this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable. Conclusion Although this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable pattern, most of the patterns had adequate stability for clinical applications (mean, 125 N).</description><subject>Bicuspid - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics. Biorheology</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - physiology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Molar - physiology</subject><subject>Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEokvhBTggXxCnXcZ27CQIIbWlBaSiSiw9W15nQr0k8eJx2u6b8LgkuwtIHJAs2fL8_29rvsmy5xwWHLh-vV6sQ0cLAeMFyAXw_EE240ryuQIlH2YzEEU5F7LiR9kTojUA56rQj7MjAQWUkhez7OepDx26G9t7Z1u2TBGJ2HtPKfrVkHzo2bgu_L3dnZcu4h2xa8Ka-Z6d-tYmjJPRfvMpTYdN6xP7YruB2BUlDCl02zfshGgM7rBPLDSsYp8x3YSa2K23Y3rvE7LzFnf1felp9qixLeGzw36cXV-cfz37OL-8-vDp7ORy7vIc0twJqPMKy3JVKadyWTR5IbjWRc1tbUUDpZMKlYSq0ErnoLEQpQKoRO5AC5DH2at97iaGHwNSMp0nh21rewwDmUKDkFJV5agUe6WLgShiYzbRdzZuDQczATFrMwExExAD0oxARtOLQ_yw6rD-Y_lNYBS8PAgsjQSaaHvn6a9OykJrPr3-dq_DsRm3HqMh57F3WPuILpk6-P__490_dtf6HfPvuEVahyH2Y5sNNyQMmOU0OtPkcACQuarkL6p6vl8</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD</creator><creator>Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS</creator><creator>Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD</creator><creator>Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD</creator><creator>Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD</creator><creator>Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Stress Distribution on Fixation Screws Used in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Assessment of 9 Methods via Finite Element Method</title><author>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD ; Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS ; Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD ; Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD ; Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD ; Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-c20d49e88b95c5437f4721667d1ada2f08c35e53097656406e728500924c06203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bicuspid - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics. Biorheology</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - physiology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Molar - physiology</topic><topic>Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohluli, Behnam, DMD</au><au>Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar, DDS</au><au>Bohluli, Pedram, DDS, MS, PhD</au><au>Sarkarat, Farzin, DMD</au><au>Moharamnejad, Nima, DMD</au><au>Tabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Seif, DDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Stress Distribution on Fixation Screws Used in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Assessment of 9 Methods via Finite Element Method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2765</spage><epage>2769</epage><pages>2765-2769</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><coden>JOMSDA</coden><abstract>Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods A 3-dimensional computerized model of a human mandible with posterior teeth was generated. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was virtually performed on this model. The separated model was assembled with 9 fixation methods: single screw, 2 screws one behind the other, 2 screws one below the other, 3 screws in an L configuration, 3 screws in an inverted backward L configuration, miniplate with 2 screws, miniplate with 4 screws, 2 parallel plates (upper + lower border), and square miniplate with 4 screws. Then, 75-, 135-, and 600-N vertical loads were applied on the posterior teeth of these models. The stress distribution on the screw sites on the buccal cortex was measured by the finite element method. Results In this model all the fixation methods withstood forces between 75 and 135 N. However, the single-screw and the 2-hole miniplate models showed that the stress distributions in the configurations were intolerable when 600 N of posterior force was applied. The results of this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable. Conclusion Although this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable pattern, most of the patterns had adequate stability for clinical applications (mean, 125 N).</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20708317</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.014</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2391 |
ispartof | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2010-11, Vol.68 (11), p.2765-2769 |
issn | 0278-2391 1531-5053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760233598 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bicuspid - physiology Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics. Biorheology Bone Plates Bone Screws Computer Simulation Dentistry Equipment Design Finite Element Analysis Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Mandible - surgery Mandibular Condyle - physiology Materials Testing Medical sciences Models, Biological Molar - physiology Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation Orthopedic surgery Osteotomy - instrumentation Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Stress, Mechanical Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics Tomography, X-Ray Computed User-Computer Interface |
title | Biomechanical Stress Distribution on Fixation Screws Used in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: Assessment of 9 Methods via Finite Element Method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A25%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Stress%20Distribution%20on%20Fixation%20Screws%20Used%20in%20Bilateral%20Sagittal%20Split%20Ramus%20Osteotomy:%20Assessment%20of%209%20Methods%20via%20Finite%20Element%20Method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Bohluli,%20Behnam,%20DMD&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2765&rft.epage=2769&rft.pages=2765-2769&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft.coden=JOMSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E760233598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=760233598&rft_id=info:pmid/20708317&rft_els_id=S0278239110003459&rfr_iscdi=true |