Evaluation of A-V Impulse Technology as a Treatment for Oedema Following Polytetrafluoroethylene Femoropopliteal Surgery in a Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract Objective To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery. Design Prospective randomized clinical trial. Materials 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2010-11, Vol.40 (5), p.635-642
Hauptverfasser: te Slaa, A, Dolmans, D.E.J.G.J, Ho, G.H, Mulder, P.G.H, van der Waal, J.C.H, de Groot, H.G.W, van der Laan, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery. Design Prospective randomized clinical trial. Materials 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated postoperatively with a compression stocking (CS) (Group-1, n  = 19) or with A-V (Group-2, n  = 17). Methods Patients in treatment group-1 used a CS postoperatively during 1 week day and night, patients in group-2 were treated with A-V postoperatively at night during one week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points. Results Limb circumference has increased postoperatively on day 1 (CS 1.5%/A-V 1.4%), on day 4 (5.7%/6.3%), on day 7 (6.6%/6.1%), on day 14 (7.9%/7.7%) and on day 90 (5.8%/5.2%). Differences between treatment groups were not significant. A re-operation gives a significant 3.9% increase in circumference as compared to a first operation (95% CI: 1.5–6.4%; p  = 0.002). Conclusion No significant differences were found in the extent of developed edema between the groups following PTFE femoropopliteal bypass surgery. A redo peripheral bypass operation results in significantly more postoperative oedema than a first-time performed bypass operation.
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.06.011