Renal biopsy practice in France: results of a nationwide study

Background. Although several risk factors associated with complications after renal biopsy (RB) have been identified, the gold standard for RB procedures remains to be defined. Practices vary widely among nephrologists, depending on personal experience and the availability of particular techniques....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2010-11, Vol.25 (11), p.3579-3585
Hauptverfasser: Bollée, Guillaume, Martinez, Frank, Moulin, Bruno, Meulders, Quentin, Rougier, Jean-Philippe, Baumelou, Alain, Glotz, Denis, Subra, Jean-François, Ulinski, Tim, Vrigneaud, Laurence, Brasseur, José, Martin, Laurent, Daniel, Laurent, Kourilsky, Olivier, Deteix, Patrice, Sie, Pierre, Ronco, Pierre, Houillier, Pascal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Although several risk factors associated with complications after renal biopsy (RB) have been identified, the gold standard for RB procedures remains to be defined. Practices vary widely among nephrologists, depending on personal experience and the availability of particular techniques. The purpose of our study was to depict the main aspects of the practice of RB in adults in France. Methods. Members of the Société de Néphrologie in France were asked to participate in a questionnaire survey on RB procedures. Results. Eighty-eight nephrologists from 74 units (27 in teaching hospitals, 35 in public general hospitals and 12 in private centres) participated in our study. Native kidney and graft biopsies were performed in 73 and 35 units, respectively. RB activity was highly variable among units, ranging from several hundred to
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfq254