Two adjacent E box elements and a M‐CAT box are involved in the muscle‐specific regulation of the rat acetylcholine receptor β subunit gene
We have isolated and analysed the 5′ flanking region of the rat acetylcholine receptor (AChR) β subunit gene and determined regulatory elements that confer muscle specificity. Deletion mapping revealed a minimal TATA‐box‐less promoter region containing an initiator motif. An 85‐bp fragment has been...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of biochemistry 1993-09, Vol.216 (2), p.395-404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We have isolated and analysed the 5′ flanking region of the rat acetylcholine receptor (AChR) β subunit gene and determined regulatory elements that confer muscle specificity. Deletion mapping revealed a minimal TATA‐box‐less promoter region containing an initiator motif. An 85‐bp fragment has been shown to promote high muscle‐specific expression of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter construct upon transfection in primary muscle cells. This sequence can be functionally dissected in a basal muscle‐specific promoter element carrying a M‐CAT box that is flanked at the 5′ end by an enhancer element with two binding sites for myogenic factors. Point mutations in the M‐CAT box cause the loss of transcriptional activity of the basal promoter fragment. The enhancer activity depends on the presence of both E boxes that cooperate in a synergistic fashion. We therefore conclude that the control of muscle‐specific and developmental expression of the rat AChR β subunit gene requires both regulatory elements, the M‐CAT box and two adjacent E boxes, located in close proximity to each other. Cotransfection experiments in NIH3T3 cells demonstrate that the rat AChR β subunit gene can be transactivated by myogenic factors displaying a preference for myogenin, as well as MRF4 and myf5 compared to a clearly weaker responsiveness to MyoD1. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-2956 1432-1033 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18157.x |