Comparison of the effectiveness of moxalactam and cefazolin in the prevention of infection in patients undergoing abdominal operations

Patients undergoing elective intraabdominal operations received a three-dose prophylactic regimen of either moxalactam (83 patients) or cefazolin (98 patients) in a blinded, randomized fashion. There was a 9% overall infection rate with 6% for those in the cefazolin group (6/98), and 12% for those t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 1985, Vol.3 (1), p.25-31
Hauptverfasser: Plouffe, J.F., Perkins, R.L., Fass, R.J., Carey, L.C., Macynski, M.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients undergoing elective intraabdominal operations received a three-dose prophylactic regimen of either moxalactam (83 patients) or cefazolin (98 patients) in a blinded, randomized fashion. There was a 9% overall infection rate with 6% for those in the cefazolin group (6/98), and 12% for those treated with moxalactam (10/83) ( p = 0.26 ). Infection rates stratified by types of surgery were similar for both regimens. The drugs were well tolerated, with minimal side effects. Patients at highest risk of infection were those with obstruction of upper gastrointestinal tract and those with pancreatitis. We concluded that moxalactam was no more effective than cefazolin in preventing postoperative infections in this study population.
ISSN:0732-8893
1879-0070
DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(85)90063-X