COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT THORACIC TRAUMA

Computed tomographic (CT) scanning has proved to be valuable in evaluating the head and abdomen of victims of blunt trauma; CT scans of the thorax often are obtained on patients with blunt torso trauma, but their value for this purpose is unclear. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the rol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of trauma 1993-08, Vol.35 (2), p.296-302
Hauptverfasser: Poole, Galen V., Morgan, David B., Cranston, Philip E., Muakkassa, Farid F., Griswold, John A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Computed tomographic (CT) scanning has proved to be valuable in evaluating the head and abdomen of victims of blunt trauma; CT scans of the thorax often are obtained on patients with blunt torso trauma, but their value for this purpose is unclear. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the role of chest CT scanning in thoracic trauma. Hemodynamically stable patients at least 18 years old with an estimated Abbreviated Injury Scale—Thorax score of 2 or greater underwent a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest, usually in conjunction with CT scans of the head, abdomen, or both. Thirteen patients were dead on arrival, 14 required emergency surgical procedures, and 13 were too unstable to undergo chest CT scan. Thirty-three patients were not included because they refused to participate or the protocol was not followed. Forty-six men (69%) and 21 women with a mean age of 42.7 years completed the study. Sixty-one were injured in motor vehicle crashes, four were injured in falls, and one each was injured by assault and by crushing forces. Injury Severity Scores ranged from 4 to 45, with a mean of 20.5. Four patients died (6%), three from head injury and one from multiple organ dysfunction. Chest roentgenography (CXR) was superior to CT scanning in identifying rib fractures, but CT scanning was more sensitive than CXR for pneumothorax, fluid collections, and infiltrates (p < 0.001); CT scanning also was more specific for aortic injury. Despite this quantitative superiority, the abnormalities missed by CXR but identified by CT scanning infrequently led to a change in management. The pneumothoraces and effusions were small and usually resolved without intervention. A CT scan of the chest can detect many thoracic injuries not evident on CXR, but most of these abnormalities have no clinical significance. Emergent CT scans of the chest should not be obtained as a routine study in patients with thoracic trauma.
ISSN:0022-5282
1529-8809
DOI:10.1097/00005373-199308000-00021