Detection of colorectal cancer using 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET
OBJECTIVEWe investigated the feasibility of 3′-deoxy-3′-F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) for the detection of colorectal cancer, in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-F-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET, and investigated correlation of the two radiotracers used with proliferative activity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear medicine communications 2009-11, Vol.30 (11), p.841-845 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVEWe investigated the feasibility of 3′-deoxy-3′-F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) for the detection of colorectal cancer, in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-F-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET, and investigated correlation of the two radiotracers used with proliferative activity as indicated by Ki-67 index.
METHODSA total of 26 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were examined with FLT PET and FDG PET. Tumor lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding that of surrounding normal tissue. For semiquantitative analysis, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated.
RESULTSIn all 26 patients, colorectal cancers were detected by both FLT PET and FDG PET. The mean (±SD) values of FLT SUV in colon cancer (5.4±2.4) and in rectal cancer (5.6±1.3) were significantly lower than the corresponding values of FDG SUV (12.4±6.3 and 12.5±4.7, respectively) (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0143-3636 1473-5628 |
DOI: | 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328330294d |