Beyond the Poverty Line
On Jul 13, 2008, New York City's poverty rate was 18%. Twenty-four hours later it had ballooned to 23% How did more than 400,000 New Yorkers become impoverished overnight? The answer is that Mayor Michael Bloomberg adopted anew and more complex - and, he argued, more accurate - measure of pover...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stanford social innovation review 2010-10, Vol.8 (4), p.30-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | On Jul 13, 2008, New York City's poverty rate was 18%. Twenty-four hours later it had ballooned to 23% How did more than 400,000 New Yorkers become impoverished overnight? The answer is that Mayor Michael Bloomberg adopted anew and more complex - and, he argued, more accurate - measure of poverty than the one the federal government uses. His action reignited a debate in Washington, D.C, and beyond about how America determines who is poor - a debate that many hope will be settled by the U.S. Congress this year. Most people who care about measuring poverty - academics, policymakers, nonprofit leaders, and the like - agree that the way the federal government currently determines who is poor and who is not doesn't work. The so-called "poverty line" was determined in the mid-1960s by calculating the amount of money it costs to buy a basic basket of food and then multiplying that amount by three. Each year the fine is updated to account for inflation. ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1542-7099 |