Reliability of the Part II board certification examination in psychiatry: examination stability
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability (examination stability) of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) Part II (oral) examination in psychiatry. METHOD: The authors analyzed the consistency (agreement between grades given by two independent examiners) for a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychiatry 1993-07, Vol.150 (7), p.1077-1080 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability
(examination stability) of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology
(ABPN) Part II (oral) examination in psychiatry. METHOD: The authors
analyzed the consistency (agreement between grades given by two independent
examiners) for a 1-year examination cycle using a weighted kappa statistic
and compared different parts of the examination (live patient and
videotape), different examination sites, different days, and different
times of the day. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in agreement
between examiners by different parts of the examination, examination site,
day of the week, or time of day. CONCLUSIONS: The stability of the Part II
ABPN examination in psychiatry is not influenced significantly by the
format or site of administration. Candidate performance is the predominant
factor in the determination of passing or failing grades. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-953X 1535-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ajp.150.7.1077 |