Value of Dobutamine Technetium-99m-Sestamibi SPECT and Echocardiography in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease Compared with Coronary Angiography
The value of dobutamine echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging was evaluated as a noninvasive diagnostic method for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Twenty-seven patients who underwent coronary angiography were submitted to two separate injections of 99mTc-sestamibi, one under co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1993-06, Vol.34 (6), p.889-894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The value of dobutamine echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging was evaluated as a noninvasive diagnostic method for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Twenty-seven patients who underwent coronary angiography were submitted to two separate injections of 99mTc-sestamibi, one under control conditions and the other after reaching a peak dobutamine infusion rate. Simultaneous ECG and echocardiographic monitoring was also performed during stepwise dobutamine infusion. Whereas the overall sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine sestamibi SPECT imaging were 94% and 88%, these values for dobutamine ECG and echocardiography were 61%, 55% and 84%, 88%, respectively. When dobutamine echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging were evaluated together, the diagnostic accuracy reaches almost 100%. Dobutamine echocardiography is of value in determining ischemic threshold earlier than clinical symptoms and allows simultaneous evaluation of ventricular performance and contractile function associated with perfusion abnormalities on 99,Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. Our experience shows that 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging, when combined with dobutamine echocardiography, is a safe, practical, well tolerated method with high diagnostic accuracy for the evaluation of CAD. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |