Interpretive disparity among pathologists in breast sentinel lymph node evaluation

Immunohistochemical staining on breast sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is controversial. Twenty-five SLN cases were reviewed by 10 pathologists (three academic, seven private) including 5 negative by both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry, 11 micrometastases (2 mm) positive for bot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2003-10, Vol.186 (4), p.324-329
Hauptverfasser: ROBERTS, Cory A, BEITSCH, Peter D, HALL, Joe D, LINDBERG, Guy, MOLBERG, Kyle, SABOORIAN, Hossein, LITZ, Craig E, HILTON, D. Sue, EWING, Gene E, CLIFFORD, Edward, TAYLOR, Walton, HAPKE, Marc R, BABAIAN, Armineh, KHALID, Imrana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Immunohistochemical staining on breast sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is controversial. Twenty-five SLN cases were reviewed by 10 pathologists (three academic, seven private) including 5 negative by both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry, 11 micrometastases (2 mm) positive for both H&E and immunohistochemistry. Answers included "positive," "negative," and "indeterminate" for each slide. The mean number of incorrect responses was 6.6 for immunohistochemistry and 5 for H&E. Twelve percent of cases were correct by all 10 pathologists; 80% of positive IHC cases had at least one pathologist score it incorrectly. As tumor cells decrease in number, incorrect responses increase. When tumor cells numbered less than 10, more than 30% of pathologists answered incorrectly. As tumor cells decrease in number pathologists' ability to recognize them decreases. We propose adding "indeterminate" to "positive" and "negative" when tumor cells number less than 10.
ISSN:0002-9610
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00268-X