The inhibition of fibroblast-populated collagen lattice contraction by human amniotic fluid : a chronologic examination

The effect of human amniotic fluid on fetal wound healing remains to be fully elucidated and may lead to the isolation of factors that could modulate adult wound healing. This study uses an in vitro model of wound contraction, the fibroblast-populated collagen lattice, to examine the effects of chro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 1993-06, Vol.91 (7), p.1287-1293
Hauptverfasser: WIDER, T. M, YAGER, J. S, RITTENBERG, T, HUGO, N. E, EHRLICH, H. P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effect of human amniotic fluid on fetal wound healing remains to be fully elucidated and may lead to the isolation of factors that could modulate adult wound healing. This study uses an in vitro model of wound contraction, the fibroblast-populated collagen lattice, to examine the effects of chronologically sampled human amniotic fluid on contraction of lattices composed of either human adult or fetal fibroblasts. This chronology has not been reported previously. Human amniotic fluid was obtained in a sterile fashion via amniocentesis from 120 different women at different time points in gestation, ranging from 13 to 24 weeks. At each time point of gestation, three to five samples were individually examined in duplicate sets. Only fluid from pregnancies deemed normal by amniocentesis was included. Contaminated specimens were discarded. Using Bell's protocol, lattices were constructed of acid-soluble rat tail collagen, growth medium, and either human adult fibroblasts or human fetal fibroblasts. Lattices contained 20% v/v human amniotic fluid. In the control lattices, phosphate-buffered saline replaced amniotic fluid in equal volumes. Area was measured at 24-hour intervals, and all tests were run in duplicate for each specimen. The mean area at each interval was computed for each gestational week examined. Data were analyzed for significance with ANOVA and Dunnett's t test against control.
ISSN:0032-1052
1529-4242
DOI:10.1097/00006534-199306000-00015