Freeze substitution after fast-freeze fixation in preparation for immunocytochemistry

As compared to classical chemical fixation, the physical immobilization of ultrastructures by fast‐freeze fixation (FFF) and the subsequent exchange of water in its solid state by freeze substitution (FS) improve the preparation procedure for immunogold labeling (IGL). FFF‐FS results in a morphological preservation of unchallenged quality, as well as in a better preservation of antigenic reactivity, thus allowing remarkable precision of labeling on sections. However, FFF, particularly over a cooled metal plate, requires a heavy and expensive machine. It is not suitable for all biological specimens and in the best conditions, which remain difficult to standardize, the thickness of the well‐preserved portion of the specimen does not exceed a few μm for compact tissues, and exceptionally 30–40 μm for isolated cells. The FS procedure is long and must be adjusted empirically for every new specimen and antigenic detection. The preservation of a given antigen's reactivity in the presence of fixative agents and embedding resins remains unpredictable. The action of fixative agents is different and milder in FS than when they are used classically in chemical fixation. By chance, one of the best FS procedures for the preservation of both ultrastructure and antigenicity appears to be by using acetone alone, together with a molecular sieve to improve the water exchange process. A large choice of embedding resins usually allows us to find a compromise between ultrastructural and antigenic preservation. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.